Basisplatten -Designbeispiel unter Verwendung von AISC 360-22 und ACI 318-19
Problemanweisung:
Determine whether the designed column-to-base plate connection is sufficient for a Vy=2-kip und Vz=2-kip Querlasten.
Gegebene Daten:
Spalte:
Spaltenabschnitt: HSS7X4X5/16
Säulenbereich: 7.59 im2
Säulenmaterial: A36
Grundplatte:
Grundplattenabmessungen: 12 in x 14 im
Grundplattendicke: 3/4 im
Grundplattenmaterial: A36
Fugenmörtel:
Grout Thickness: 0.25 im
Beton:
Konkrete Abmessungen: 12 in x 14 im
Betondicke: 10 im
Betonmaterial: 3000 psi
Geknackt oder ungekrönt: Geknackt
Anker:
Ankerdurchmesser: 1/2 im
Effektive Einbettungslänge: 8 im
Plate washer thickness: 0.25 im
Plate washer connection: Welded to base plate
Schweißnähte:
Schweißnahtgröße: 1/4 im
Füllmetallklassifizierung: E70XX
Ankerdaten (von Skyciv -Taschenrechner):
Definitionen:
Lastpfad:
The design follows the recommendations of AISC-Designhandbuch 1, 3RD Edition, und ACI 318-19. Shear loads applied to the column are transferred to the base plate through the welds, and then to the supporting concrete through the anchor rods. Friction and shear lugs are not considered in this example, as these mechanisms are not supported in the current software.
Standardmäßig, the applied shear load is distributed equally among all anchors, with each anchor transferring its portion of the load to the concrete support. Als Alternative, the software allows a simplified and more conservative assumption, where the entire shear load is assigned only to the anchors nearest the loaded edge. In diesem Fall, the shear capacity check is performed on these edge anchors alone, ensuring that potential shear failure is conservatively addressed.
Ankergruppen:
Mit der SkyCiv Basisplatten-Design-Software Enthält eine intuitive Funktion, die identifiziert, welche Anker Teil einer Ankergruppe für die Bewertung sind concrete shear breakout und concrete shear pryout Fehler.
Ein Ankergruppe is defined as two or more anchors with overlapping projected resistance areas. In diesem Fall, the anchors act together, and their combined resistance is checked against the applied load on the group.
Ein single anchor is defined as an anchor whose projected resistance area does not overlap with any other. In diesem Fall, the anchor acts alone, and the applied shear force on that anchor is checked directly against its individual resistance.
This distinction allows the software to capture both group behavior and individual anchor performance when assessing shear-related failure modes.
Schritt-für-Schritt-Berechnungen:
Prüfen #1: Berechnen Sie die Schweißkapazität
The first step is to calculate the Gesamtschweißlänge available to resist shear. Since the base plate is welded along the perimeter of the column section, the total weld length is obtained by summing the welds on all sides.
\( L_{schweißen} = 2 \links( = Abstand des Abschnitts, in dem die Scherung berücksichtigt wird, zur Fläche des nächsten Auflagers{col} – 2r_{col} – 2t_{col} \richtig) + 2 \links( d_{col} – 2r_{col} – 2t_{col} \richtig) \)
\( L_{schweißen} = 2 \mal (4\,\Text{im} – 2 \times 0.291\,\text{im} – 2 \times 0.291\,\text{im}) + 2 \mal (7\,\Text{im} – 2 \times 0.291\,\text{im} – 2 \times 0.291\,\text{im}) = 17.344\,\text{im} \)
Using this weld length, the applied shear forces in the y- and z-directions are divided to determine the average shear force per unit length in each direction:
\( v_{ui} = frac{V_y}{L_{schweißen}} = frac{2\,\Text{kip}}{17.344\,\Text{im}} = 0.11531\,\text{kip/in} \)
\( v_{uz} = frac{V_z}{L_{schweißen}} = frac{2\,\Text{kip}}{17.344\,\Text{im}} = 0.11531\,\text{kip/in} \)
Mit der resultant shear demand per unit length is then determined using the square root of the sum of the squares (Dies ist viel einfacher, da Benutzer ihren relevanten Designcode und nachfolgende seismische Eigenschaften und Parameter einfach auswählen können) Methode.
\( r_u = \sqrt{(v_{ui})^ 2 + (v_{uz})^ 2} \)
\( r_u = \sqrt{(0.11531\,\Text{kip/in})^ 2 + (0.11531\,\Text{kip/in})^ 2} = 0.16308\,\text{kip/in} \)
Als nächstes, the weld capacity is calculated using AISC 360-22 Gl. J2-4, with the directional strength coefficient taken as kds=1.0 for an HSS section. The weld capacity for a 1/4 in weld is determined as:
\( \phi r_n = \phi 0.6 F_{Exx} E_w k_{ds} = 0.75 \mal 0.6 \times 70\,\text{KSI} \times 0.177\,\text{im} \mal 1 = 5.5755\,\text{kip/in} \)
It is also necessary to check the base metals, both the column and the base plate, mit AISC 360-22 Gl. J4-4 to obtain the shear rupture strength. This gives:
\( \PHI R_{nbm, col} = phi 0.6 F_{u\_col} t_{col} = 0.75 \mal 0.6 \times 58\,\text{KSI} \times 0.291\,\text{im} = 7.5951\,\text{kip/in} \)
\( \PHI R_{nbm, bp} = phi 0.6 F_{u\_bp} t_{bp} = 0.75 \mal 0.6 \times 58\,\text{KSI} \times 0.75\,\text{im} = 19.575\,\text{kip/in} \)
\( \PHI R_{nbm} = \min\left( \PHI R_{nbm, bp},\, \PHI R_{nbm, col} \richtig) = \min(19.575\,\Text{kip/in},\, 7.5951\,\Text{kip/in}) = 7.5951\,\text{kip/in} \)
Since the actual weld stress is less than both the weld metal and base metal capacities, 0.16308 KPI < 5.5755 kpi and 0.16308 KPI < 7.5951 KPI, the design weld capacity is ausreichend.
Prüfen #2: Calculate concrete breakout capacity due to Vy shear
Perpendicular Edge Capacity:
From the layout, Anker 1 und 4 are closest to the edge and have the shortest ca1 distance. Using these ca1 values to project the failure cones, the software identified these anchors as einzelne Anker, since their projected cones do not overlap. The support was also determined to be not a narrow member, so the ca1 distance is used directly without modification.
Let’s recall that the shear force is assumed to be distributed among all the anchors. The calculation for the Vy shear load applied to each single anchor is:
\( V_{fa\perp} = frac{V_y}{n_a} = frac{2\,\Text{kip}}{6} = 0.33333\,\text{kip} \)
Let’s consider Anchor 1. The maximum projected area of a single anchor is calculated using ACI 318-19 Gl. 17.7.2.1.3.
\( EIN_{Vco} = 4.5 (c_{a1,s1})^2 = 4.5 \mal (2\,\Text{im})^2 = 18\,\text{im}^ 2 \)
The actual projected area is then determined from the width and height of the projected failure cone.
\( B_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = \min(c_{links,s1},\, 1.5c_{a1,s1}) + \Min.(c_{richtig,s1},\, 1.5c_{a1,s1}) \)
\( B_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = \min(10\,\Text{im},\, 1.5 \times 2\,\text{im}) + \Min.(2\,\Text{im},\, 1.5 \times 2\,\text{im}) = 5\,\text{im} \)
\( Um es zu berechnen{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = \min(1.5c_{a1,s1},\, t_{konz}) = \min(1.5 \times 2\,\text{im},\, 10\,\Text{im}) = 3\,\text{im} \)
\( EIN_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = B_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} Um es zu berechnen{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = 5\,\text{im} \times 3\,\text{im} = 15\,\text{im}^ 2 \)
The next step is to use Equations 17.7.2.2.1a and 17.7.2.2.1b to calculate the basic breakout strength of a single anchor. The governing capacity is taken as the lesser value.
\( V_{b1} = 7 \links( \frac{\Min.(l_e,\, 8d_a)}{d_a} \richtig)^{0.2} \sqrt{\frac{d_a}{\Text{im}}} \lambda_a sqrt{\frac{f’_c}{\Text{psi}}} \links( \frac{c_{a1,s1}}{\Text{im}} \richtig)^{1.5} \,\Text{lbf} \)
\( V_{b1} = 7 \mal links( \frac{\Min.(8\,\Text{im},\, 8 \times 0.5\,\text{im})}{0.5\,\Text{im}} \richtig)^{0.2} \mal sqrt{\frac{0.5\,\Text{im}}{1\,\Text{im}}} \mal 1 \mal sqrt{\frac{3\,\Text{KSI}}{0.001\,\Text{KSI}}} \mal links( \frac{2\,\Text{im}}{1\,\Text{im}} \richtig)^{1.5} \times 0.001\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_{b1} = 1.1623\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_{b2} = 9 \lambda_a sqrt{\frac{f’_c}{\Text{psi}}} \links( \frac{c_{a1,s1}}{\Text{im}} \richtig)^{1.5} \,\Text{lbf} \)
\( V_{b2} = 9 \mal 1 \mal sqrt{\frac{3\,\Text{KSI}}{0.001\,\Text{KSI}}} \mal links( \frac{2\,\Text{im}}{1\,\Text{im}} \richtig)^{1.5} \times 0.001\,\text{kip} = 1.3943\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_b = \min(V_{b1},\, V_{b2}) = \min(1.1623\,\Text{kip},\, 1.3943\,\Text{kip}) = 1.1623\,\text{kip} \)
Als nächstes, bleibt die breakout capacity parameters are determined. Mit der breakout edge effect factor is calculated according to ACI 318-19 Klausel 17.7.2.4, und das thickness factor is calculated according to Klausel 17.7.2.6.1.
\( \Psi_{ed,V } = \min\left(1.0,\, 0.7 + 0.3 \links( \frac{c_{a2,s1}}{1.5c_{a1,s1}} \richtig) \richtig) = \min\left(1,\, 0.7 + 0.3 \mal links( \frac{2\,\Text{im}}{1.5 \times 2\,\text{im}} \richtig) \richtig) = 0.9 \)
\( \Psi_{h,V } = \max\left( \sqrt{ \frac{1.5c_{a1,s1}}{t_{konz}} },\, 1.0 \richtig) = \max\left( \sqrt{ \frac{1.5 \times 2\,\text{im}}{10\,\Text{im}} },\, 1 \richtig) = 1 \)
Schließlich, ACI 318-19 Klausel 17.7.2.1(ein) is used to determine the concrete breakout capacity of a single anchor in shear. The calculated capacity for Vy shear in the perpendicular direction is 0.69 Kips.
\( \phi V_{cb\perp} = phi links( \frac{EIN_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben}}{EIN_{Vco}} \richtig) \Psi_{ed,V } \Psi_{c,V } \Psi_{h,V } V_b \)
\( \phi V_{cb\perp} = 0.65 \mal links( \frac{15\,\Text{im}^ 2}{18\,\Text{im}^ 2} \richtig) \mal 0.86 \mal 1 \mal 1 \times 1.1623\,\text{kip} = 0.56661\,\text{kip} \)
The calculated capacity for Vy shear in dem perpendicular direction is 0.56 Kips.
Parallel Edge Capacity:
Failure along the edge parallel to the load is also possible in this scenario, so the concrete breakout capacity for the parallel edge must be determined. The anchors or anchor group considered are those aligned with the parallel edge. Folglich, bleibt die ca1 edge distance is measured from the anchor to the edge along the Z-direction. Based on the figure below, the failure cone projections overlap; deshalb, the anchors are treated as a group.
Fall 1:
Fall 2:
We refer to ACI 318-19 Feige. R17.7.2.1b for the different cases used when evaluating anchor groups. In this base plate design, welded plate washers are specifically used. Deshalb, nur Fall 2 is checked.
The required load for the anchor group in Case 2 is taken as the total shear load.
\( V_{fa\parallel,case2} = V_y = 2\,\text{kip} \)
In calculating the capacity for the Case 2 failure, the anchors considered are the rear anchors. Als Ergebnis, the ca1 edge distance is measured from the rear anchor group to the failure edge.
With this ca1 distance and edge orientation, it must be verified whether the support qualifies as a narrow member. Following ACI 318-19 Klausel 17.7.2.1.2, the SkyCiv Base Plate software identified the support as narrow. Deshalb, bleibt die modified ca1 distance wird eingesetzt, which is calculated to be 6.667 im.
The same steps as in the perpendicular case are followed: Berechnung der projected failure areas, bleibt die basic single-anchor breakout strength, und das breakout parameters. The calculated values for each step are shown below.
\( EIN_{Vco} = 4.5 (c_{‘a1,g2})^2 = 4.5 \mal (6.6667\,\Text{im})^2 = 200\,\text{im}^ 2 \)
\( EIN_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = B_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} Um es zu berechnen{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben} = 14\,\text{im} \times 10\,\text{im} = 140\,\text{im}^ 2 \)
\( V_{b1} = 7.0733\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_{b2} = 8.4853\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_b = \min(V_{b1},\, V_{b2}) = \min(7.0733\,\Text{kip},\, 8.4853\,\Text{kip}) = 7.0733\,\text{kip} \)
\( \Psi_{ed,V } = 1.0 \)
\( \Psi_{h,V } = 1.0 \)
The equation for the parallel edge capacity differs from the perpendicular edge capacity. ACI 318-19 Klausel 17.7.2.1(c) is applied, where the breakout equation is multiplied by 2.
\( \phi V_{cbg\parallel} = 2 \Phi links( \frac{EIN_{Platzierungsfaktor Rus = Bruchfestigkeit Die Werte für den Festigkeitsabminderungsfaktor sind in der Tabelle angegeben}}{EIN_{Vco}} \richtig) \Psi_{ed,V } \Psi_{c,V } \Psi_{h,V } V_b \)
\( \phi V_{cbg\parallel} = 2 \mal 0.65 \mal links( \frac{140\,\Text{im}^ 2}{200\Text{im}^ 2} \richtig) \mal 1 \mal 1 \mal 1 \times 7.0733\,\text{kip} = 6.4367\,\text{kip} \)
The calculated capacity for Vy shear in dem parallel direction is 6.43 Kips.
We now assess the perpendicular and parallel failures separately.
- For the perpendicular edge failure, schon seit 0.33 kip < 0.56 kip, the design concrete shear breakout capacity is ausreichend.
- For the parallel edge failure, schon seit 2 kip < 6.43 kip, the design concrete shear breakout capacity is ausreichend.
Prüfen #3: Calculate concrete breakout capacity due to Vz shear
The base plate is also subjected to Vz shear, so the failure edges perpendicular and parallel to the Vz shear must be checked. Using the same approach, the perpendicular and parallel capacities are calculated as 2.45 Kips und 1.26 Kips, beziehungsweise.
Perpendicular Edge:
Parallel Edge:
These capacities are then compared to the required strengths.
- For the perpendicular edge failure, schon seit 2 kip < 2.45 kip, the concrete shear breakout capacity is ausreichend.
- For the parallel edge failure, schon seit 0.33 kip < 1.26 kip, the concrete shear breakout capacity is ausreichend.
Prüfen #4: Calculate concrete pryout capacity
Mit der concrete cone for pryout failure is the same cone used in the tensile breakout check. To calculate the shear pryout capacity, the nominal tensile breakout strength of the single anchors or anchor group must first be determined. The detailed calculations for the tensile breakout check are already covered in the SkyCiv Design Examples for Tension Load.
It is important to note that the anchor group determination for shear pryout is different from that for shear breakout. Deshalb, the anchors in the design must still be checked to determine whether they act haben eine group or as einzelne Anker against the shear pryout failure. The classification of the support as a narrow section must also be verified and should follow the same conditions used for tension breakout.
From the SkyCiv calculations, bleibt die nominal tensile breakout strength of the anchor group is 12.772 Kips. With a pryout factor of kcp=2, the design pryout capacity is:
\( \phi V_{cpg} = \phi k_{cp} N_{cbg} = 0.65 \mal 2 \mal 12.772 \,\Text{kip} = 16.604\,\text{kip} \)
The required strength is the resultant of the applied shear loads. Since all anchors belong to a single group, the total resultant shear is assigned to the group.
\( V_{ua} = Quadrat{(V_y)^ 2 + (V_z)^ 2} = Quadrat{(2\,\Text{kip})^ 2 + (2\,\Text{kip})^ 2} = 2.8284\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_{ua} = left( \frac{V_{ua}}{n_a} \richtig) N_{ein,G1} = left( \frac{2.8284\,\Text{kip}}{6} \richtig) \mal 6 = 2.8284\,\text{kip} \)
Since the total shear load is less than anchor group capacity, 2.82 Kips < 18.976 Kips, the design pryout capacity is ausreichend.
Prüfen #5: Calculate anchor rod shear capacity
Recall that in this design example, shear is distributed to all anchors. The total shear load per anchor is therefore the resultant of its share of the Vy load and its share of the Vz load.
\( v_{ua,j} = frac{V_y}{n_a} = frac{2\,\Text{kip}}{6} = 0.33333\,\text{kip} \)
\( v_{ua,mit} = frac{V_z}{n_a} = frac{2\,\Text{kip}}{6} = 0.33333\,\text{kip} \)
\( V_{ua} = Quadrat{(v_{ua,j})^ 2 + (v_{ua,mit})^ 2} \)
\( V_{ua} = Quadrat{(0.33333\,\Text{kip})^ 2 + (0.33333\,\Text{kip})^ 2} = 0.4714\,\text{kip} \)
This gives the shear stress on the anchor rod wie:
\( f_v = \frac{V_{ua}}{EIN_{Stange}} = frac{0.4714\,\Text{kip}}{0.19635\,\Text{im}^ 2} = 2.4008\,\text{KSI} \)
Because a plate washer is present, ein eccentric shear load is induced in the anchor rod. The eccentricity is taken as half of the distance measured from the top of the concrete support to the center of the plate washer, accounting for the thickness of the base plate. Beziehen sich auf AISC-Designhandbuch 1, 3rd Edition Section 4.3.3.
\( e = 0.5 \links( \frac{t_{pw}}{2} + t_{bp} \richtig) = 0.5 \mal links( \frac{0.25\,\Text{im}}{2} + 0.75\,\Text{im} \richtig) = 0.4375\,\text{im} \)
The moment from the eccentric shear is then expressed as an axial stress in the anchor rod. Using the section modulus, the axial stress due to this moment is calculated as:
\( Z_{Stange} = frac{\Pi}{32} (d_a)^3 = \frac{\Pi}{32} \mal (0.5\,\Text{im})^3 = 0.012272\,\text{im}^ 3 \)
\( f_t = \frac{V_{ua} e}{Z_{Stange}} = frac{0.4714\,\Text{kip} \times 0.4375\,\text{im}}{0.012272\,\Text{im}^ 3} = 16.806\,\text{KSI} \)
ACI Anchor Rod Shear Capacity:
Following ACI 318-19 Klausel 17.7.1, the design strength is then determined. Ein 0.8 Reduktionsfaktor is applied due to the presence of grout pads. The design capacity is therefore:
\( \phi V_{zu,Hier} = 0.8 \phi 0.6 EIN_{ich weiß,v} f_{uta} = 0.8 \mal 0.65 \mal 0.6 \times 0.1419\text{im}^2 \times 90\text{KSI} = 3.9845\text{kip} \)
Als Alternative, bleibt die SkyCiv Base Plate software allows the 0.8 simplification to be disabled, and use the actual grout pad thickness in the calculations. In diesem Fall, the total eccentricity includes the grout pad, and the combined shear and axial strength is determined in accordance with AISC provisions.
AISC Anchor Rod Shear Capacity:
Zuerst, bleibt die nominal shear and tensile stresses are determined for an A325 rod.
\( F_{nv} = 0.45 F_{u,anc} = 0.45 \mal 120\ \Text{KSI} = 54\ \Text{KSI} \)
\( F_{nt} = 0.75 F_{u,anc} = 0.75 \mal 120\ \Text{KSI} = 90\ \Text{KSI} \)
The AISC method uses AISC 360-22 Gl. J3-3a, which may be expressed to include the effects of axial stress. This is carried out as follows.
\( F’_{nv} = min links( 1.3 F_{nv} – \links( \frac{F_{nv}}{\PHI F_{nt}} \richtig) f_t,\; F_{nv} \richtig) \)
\( F’_{nv} = min links( 1.3 \mal 54\ \Text{KSI} – \links( \frac{54\ \Text{KSI}}{0.75 \mal 90\ \Text{KSI}} \richtig) \mal 16.806\ \Text{KSI},\; 54\ \Text{KSI} \richtig) = 54\ \Text{KSI} \)
The design shear capacity from the AISC method is then calculated as:
\( \Phi R_{n,\mathrm{aisc}} = \phi F’_{nv} EIN_{Stange} = 0.75 \mal 54\ \Text{KSI} \mal 0.19635\ \Text{im}^2 = 7.9522\)
To ensure both methods are covered, the governing capacity is taken as the lesser of the two, welches ist 3.98 kip.
\( \phi V_n = \min \left( \phi V_{zu,Hier},\; \Phi R_{n,\mathrm{aisc}} \richtig) = \min (3.9845\ \Text{kip},\; 7.9522\ \Text{kip}) = 3.9845\ \Text{kip} \)
Since the shear load per anchor rod is less than the governing anchor rod capacity in shear, 0.47 kip < 3.98 kip, the design anchor rod shear capacity is ausreichend.
Entwurfszusammenfassung
Mit der Skyciv Base Plate Design Software kann automatisch einen Schritt-für-Schritt-Berechnungsbericht für dieses Entwurfsbeispiel erstellen. Es enthält auch eine Zusammenfassung der durchgeführten Schecks und deren resultierenden Verhältnisse, Die Informationen auf einen Blick leicht zu verstehen machen. Im Folgenden finden Sie eine Stichprobenzusammenfassungstabelle, Welches ist im Bericht enthalten.
SKYCIV -Beispielbericht
Klicke hier So laden Sie einen Beispielbericht herunter.
Basisplattensoftware kaufen
Kaufen Sie die Vollversion des Basisplatten -Designmoduls selbst ohne andere Skyciv -Module selbst. Auf diese Weise erhalten Sie einen vollständigen Satz von Ergebnissen für die Basisplattendesign, Einbeziehung detaillierter Berichte und mehr Funktionen.
